Andy Lloyd's

Dark Star Blog



Blog 31   (October 2015)

  News, links, videos and comment   relating to the Dark Star Theory 



Nemesis May be on the Way Back

The Nemesis theory may be about to get a new lease of life. The theory about a distant sub-stellar companion orbiting the Sun, and periodically glancing the Oort cloud of comets with disasterous consequences, has been around since 1984, when geophysicists noticed a marked periodicity in extinction level events on the Earth (1). Astrophysicists tried to explain what could have caused this periodic extinction cycle, with, among other ideas, a distant companion to the Sun (2,3), which became known as Nemesis (4). Such a theory is not without its critics, of course.

Many doubted that the alleged periodicity of extinctions is actually accurate (and there have been a number of variations down the years, to confuse matters). Others argue that such a loosely-bound sub-stellar object in a highly elliptical orbit - which might extend out beyond a light year - is likely to itself be perturbed by external influences; and its own periodicity would therefore vary.  Most simply point to a lack of discovery of such an object by finely-tuned infra-red sky surveys (5).

Despite the scepticism, the theory has captured the imagination of many, and continues to generate thought-provoking articles (6).  There are a number of variations on a theme, including, to some extent, my own Dark Star Theory (7), which explores the potential catastrophism associated with a rogue companion object, albeit located much closer to home than the original Nemesis concept. 

The extinction cycle aspect of the case also continues to intrigue.  In 2010, a new study into a possible cycle not only confirmed a periodicity (of 27 million years, which takes into account a slight stretching out of geological time within more modern academic calculations), but found that it extended over a much longer geological time period than previously thought, of up to 500 million years (8).  However, the authors were sceptical that a purported Nemesis object would be to blame, perhaps noting Nemesis-theorist Richard Miller's 2002 paper arguing that the orbit of the object had been perturbed some 400 million years ago (9), thus affecting its regularity over the full 0.5 billion year period in question.

Still, something is causing this remarkably clockwork extinction cycle, and it's likely to be something astrophysical. 

A paper published this year has concluded that there is a very strong link between comet and/or asteroid impacts, and the major extinction level events which have taken place over the last 260 million years (10).  This is despite the protecting influence of Jupiter and Saturn which should prevent most long-period comets from finding their way into the inner solar system (11).  One of the authors, Michael Rampino, has recently argued that the periodic extinction events are linked to the carousel motion of the solar system through the galactic plane, which may in turn feature a disk of Dark Matter.  This DM disk, or series of clumps, could affect comets and planets alike, above and beyond Galactic tidal effects (12). 

Such an assertion seems even more far-fetched than Nemesis.  Both involve an unseen and undiscovered hypothetical ingredient, either in the form of clumps of dark matter, or missing sub-stellar objects in our backyard.  But then, if these extinction events really are related to each other in a periodic way, there must be something pulling the trigger on a regular basis. 

This new study at least confirms that impacting comets and/or asteroids are to blame for the extinctions, and long-period comets, at least, must be breaking through the defences offered by Jupiter and Saturn.  On a statistical basis, then, this implies that the impacting comet showers must be very considerable indeed.  After all, for some of the shot to hit its diminutive target (i.e. the Earth and Moon), a cosmic blunderbuss is required.  Nemesis, or a smaller cousin, may not be so fantastical after all.


Written by Andy Lloyd, 22nd October 2015


1)  D. Raup & J. Sepkoski "Periodicity of Extinctions in the Geologic Past" 1st February 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 81 (3): 801–805. doi:10.1073/pnas.81.3.801

2)  M. Davis et al  "Extinction of species by periodic comet showers". Nature, 1984,  308 (5961): 715–717. Bibcode:1984Natur.308..715D. doi:10.1038/308715a0

3)  D. Whitmire & A. Jackson "Are periodic mass extinctions driven by a distant solar companion?". Nature, 1984, 308 (5961): 713–715. doi:10.1038/308713a0

4)  Richard A. Muller, "Nemesis" Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1988

5)  "NASA's WISE Survey Finds Thousands of New Stars, But No 'Planet X'" 7th March 2014

6)  Leslie Mullen "Sun's Nemesis Pelted Earth with Comets, Study Suggests" 11th March 2010

7)  Andy Lloyd "Dark Star: The Planet X Evidence" Timeless Voyager Press 2005

8) A. Melott & R. Bambach "Nemesis Reconsidered". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters, 2010, 407: L99–L102.

9)  Richard Muller "Measurement of the lunar impact record for the past 3.5 billion years, and implications for the Nemesis theory" (2010). Geol. Soc. of America Special Paper 356, pp 659–665 (2002),

10)  New York University Press release "Scientists find link between comet and asteroid showers and mass extinctions" 20th October 2015 with thanks to John

11)  Vince Stricherz "Crashing comets not likely the cause of Earth's mass extinctions: new research" 30th July 2009

12)  M. Rampino "Disc dark matter in the Galaxy and potential cycles of extraterrestrial impacts, mass extinctions and geological events" 2015, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 448, 1816-1820,













Zircon Crystals Reveal Photosynthesis on Earth over 4 Billion Years Ago

I heard this particular piece of science news on BBC Radio 4 last week, during an interview with one of the paper's authors, Mark Harrison, a Professor of Geochemistry at UCLA (1,2).  His team, combined with scientists at Stanford, believe that they have discovered evidence of life on Earth as long ago as 4.1 billion years, predating the catastrophism of the Late, Heavy Bombardment (3).

It transpires that, like ancient insects trapped in amber (as per Jurassic Park), carbon graphite can be found encased in ancient crystals of zircon, providing us with a snapshot of conditions on our planet when the crystals formed:

"Because zircon crystals are nearly indestructible, they operate as mini time capsules for geoscientists -- their trappings offer an unblemished record of the past. Recently, researchers at UCLA and Stanford analyzed 10,000 of the oldest zircon crystals ever discovered, sourced from ancient magma deposits in Western Australia. Inside a single 4.1-billion-year-old zircon fleck, scientists found pure carbon in the form of graphite.

"The carbon's composition resembles modern organic carbon, leading researchers to believe it was created by a photosynthetic creature. If so, that would mean life began on early Earth 4.1 billion years ago, 300 million years earlier than scientists previously thought. Researchers acknowledged several non-biological processes that might explain the carbon's presence, but believe organic photosynthesis is the most plausible scenario." (4)

In conjunction with other geophysical findings in recent years (5), the authors are becoming increasingly confident in asserting that the early Earth appeared a lot more like it does now - rather than the hot, dry primordial lump of rock previously thought.  An abundant presence of water on Earth so long ago (6) indicates that water was not delivered later by comets, as per the late veneer theory, but rather existed on earth right from the beginning (7).  Earth (Tiamat) would have been a watery world, then -  but not a 'water world' with no surface (as per Kevin Costner's flawed 1995 blockbuster), otherwise there would have been little chance of photosynthesis processes taking place in plant-life to provide the carbon the paper's authors have found in the ancient zircon crystals.

I think this enhances the likelihood that the Earth began its existence further away from the Sun than it is now, and migrated inwards; because if it started here, then the volatile water should have been blasted away by the early Sun's activity, like on the other planets in the inner solar system.  But the photosynthesis angle also argues against a pure 'water world' as Sitchin described for Tiamat (8).  More likely the Earth of 4.1 billion years ago exhibited many of the complex surface features of modern day Earth, which was then refashioned by the late heavy bombardment 3.9 Gyr ago (due to the arrival of the rogue 'planet' Marduk?), rebooting life.


Written by Andy Lloyd, 28th October 2015


1)  "Today"  BBC Radio 4, 20th October 2015

2)  E. Bell et al "Potentially biogenic carbon preserved in a 4.1 billion-year-old zircon" 19th October 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517557112

3)  "Life on Earth likely started 4.1 billion years ago" 20th October 2015 with thanks to Phil

4)  "Ancient zircon suggests life may have begun 4.1 billion years ago" 20th October 2015

5)  Stuart Wolpert "Plate tectonics started over 4 billion years ago, geochemists report" 26th November 2008

6)  A.R. Sarafian et al. "Early accretion of water in the inner solar system from a carbonaceous chondrite-like source", Science. Vol. 346, October 31, 2014, p. 623. doi: 10.1126/science.1256717

7)  Andy Lloyd "The Early Watery Planet" 28th November 2014

8)  Zecharia Sitchin "The Tweifth Planet" Avon 1976


Photo Credit:  UCLA/Stanford



Oxygen, on a Comet...?

Scientists studying data coming back from the Rosetta mission to comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko couldn't believe it to start with.  It's not surprising, perhaps, because oxygen is a reactive gas which should jump at the chance to create water when in contact with the immense amount of primordial hydrogen swilling around in a star-forming nebula.  In other words, any molecular oxygen (O2) at large when the comets were formed at the very beginnings of the solar system should have been used up long ago.  But, nevertheless, there it was:

"Reporting their findings in the journal Nature on Wednesday, an international team said that they detected “a lot” of molecular oxygen in the cloud of gas, or coma, surrounding the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko.  While molecular oxygen has been found in Jupiter and Saturn, it’s never been found on a comet. The neutral gas comas of most comets are composed largely of water, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide." (1)

The coma of comet 67P consists of almost 4% molecular oxygen (2) which, according to theory, simply should not be.  Planetary scientists are scrambling to explain this quirky, challenging finding.  It should have been around since the beginning of the solar system, they say, surviving against the odds on the comet possibly trapped within grains of ice crystals and rock.  Seems dubious, to be honest, but what else can they argue?  Teams of scientists are trying to tweak their calculations of the Sun's proto-nebula to allow this oxygen to emerge unscathed.  But this all seems a little desperate, a point which they seem willing to concede. 

My bet would be that the oxygen was part of Earth's primordial atmosphere, which likely would have been quite different to what it is today.  In other words, Comet 67P and the Earth share a common point of origin where part of the Earth's early (oxygen-containing) atmosphere was stripped off with this object.  Why is the Earth the likely source?  Because it's just so rare to find oxygen out there in space:

"But how did it form and manage to stick around for billions of years?  
[André] Bieler, [a physicist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor] said the international team considered two theories – either the oxygen was in the gaseous phase and endured a "shock freeze" or the oxygen was built onto the icy grains.  The researchers said the first theory was probably unlikely because “gaseous O2 has only been detected twice outside of our solar system.”" (1) 

The elephant in the room, naturally, is that the best known local source for oxygen is the Earth (although perhaps an ancient Mars might also have had an oxygenated atmosphere?).  But that's way out of left-field for these guys... That implies that the source of this comet's existence lies in a cataclysmic impact between Earth and another cosmic body.  Now, we know that such an impact did take place in the past, because current theories of Moon-formation require the apocalyptic intervention of a Mars-sized impactor, which appears to have occurred about 4.5 billion years ago (3).  But this is surely too early in the history of the Earth for it to have had an oxygenated atmosphere (which, presumably, requires photosynthesis and, thus, life).  Well, as we just discovered in the above article about zircon crystals (4), photosynthesis, water, life and thus oxygen in the atmosphere, were in place on Earth 4.1 billion years ago - after the formation of the Moon, but before the Late, Heavy Bombardment.  Did one of these impact events 3.9 billion years ago chip off Comet 67P?

As my colleague Lee Covino points out, there's a complication - one which might have made scientists considering the Earth-origin option pause for thought.  The Deuterium/Hydrogen ratio of water on Comet 67P varies considerably from that of oceanic water on present-day Earth, as discussed in the academic paper recently published by the Rosetta team:

"A further consequence would be that these icy grains have been incorporated into the comet mostly unaltered, a process that is much debated, but which has recently been proposed again and that would be in accordance with the measured high D/H ratio in 67P (5)" (6)

In fact, the comet's value is three times that of Earth's, implying that the Jupiter-family of comets, to which 67P belongs, is not likely to be a major source of the Earth's water.  That's according to the increasingly embattled late veneer theory, anyway. 

I suspect that this whole argument is volte face.  If the comet was once actually part of the early Earth, then the argument that the comets brought water to the Earth may simply be back-to-front.  Instead, the short-period comets may actually have obtained their water from the Earth instead.  The pre-cataclysmic Earth would have had to have been highly aqueous, of course.  And Earth's oceans may have since become 'polluted' by waters from long-period comets with different D/H values.  So, the D/H value of Comet 67P may simply reflect the true value of the Earth's waters way back when; 3.9 billion years ago. 

So why is there no oxygen on any of the other comets then?  Perhaps there is.  It became pretty obvious to the Rosetta science team once the probe actually got near enough to the comet: 

"“As soon as we got close enough to the comet, we actually found it right away,” says André Bieler." (2)

Perhaps we simply need to get closer to a few more comets...


Written by Andy Lloyd, 29th October 2015


1)  Michael Casey "Oxygen discovered on Rosetta comet, stunning scientists" 28th October 2015 with thanks to Lee

2) Chris Cesare "Rosetta sniffs oxygen around comet 67P" 28th October 2015

3) Nadia Drake "Asteroids Bear Scars of Moon’s Violent Formation" 16th April 2015

4) E. Bell et al "Potentially biogenic carbon preserved in a 4.1 billion-year-old zircon" 19th October 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517557112

5)  citing K. Altweg et al "67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, a Jupiter family comet with a high D/H ratio" 23rd January 2015, Science, 347, 6220

6) A. Bieler et al "Abundant Molecular Oxygen in the coma of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gersimenko" Nature 526, 678–681 (2015)



A New Zecharia Sitchin book!

A new book containing previously unpublished material by the late Zecharia Sitchin has been collated and published by his niece, Janet Sitchin.  The book appears to be a wide-ranging collection of his writings, spanning several decades, as well as lecture notes and related articles.  The book also contains some biographical content, provided by Janet Sitchin (who often served as Sitchin's lecture assistant), adding a welcome insight into the man himself.  Here's the book summary from Amazon:

"What if the tales from the Old Testament and other ancient writings, such as those from Sumer, Babylon, Egypt, and Greece, were not myths or allegory but accounts of actual historical events? Known for his ability to read and interpret ancient Sumerian and Akkadian clay tablets, Zecharia Sitchin (1920-2010) took the words of our most ancient ancestors as fact and, through decades of meticulous research, showed that they revealed a coherent narrative about the true origins of humanity and civilization. Drawing both widespread interest and criticism, his Earth Chronicles series of books, beginning with The 12th Planet, detailed how humanity arose after the arrival of the Anunnaki (“those who from Heaven to Earth came”), alien “gods” who created modern man in their own image and imparted gifts of civilizing knowledge.

"Providing an insider’s look into the decades of research behind Zecharia Sitchin’s complete works as well as an in-depth overview of his theories, this collection includes carefully selected chapters from the Earth Chronicles series as well as never-before-published letters, articles, and lectures. We learn about the genesis of The 12th Planet in “The Book as a Story,” the Sumerians and their Anunnaki influences in “The Sudden Civilization,” the orbit of Nibiru in “UFOs, Pyramids, and the 12th Planet,” the prehistory of the Americas in “Cities Lost and Found,” the extraterrestrial origins of modern man in “The Cosmic Connection--DNA,” and much more. We get to read never-before-published lectures, culled from Sitchin’s decades of presentations, as well as the article that spurred the writing of There Were Giants Upon the Earth.

Each piece includes an introduction by Sitchin’s niece, offering context and insight into Sitchin’s passionate work. These introductions reveal the man behind the theories, a world traveler known for his scholarship, dry humor, and precisely chosen words. If his theories are true, as Sitchin wholeheartedly believed, then this collection presents some of the most important knowledge we have of our origins and future."  (1)

I haven't yet read the book, so can offer no guidance as to how much of the book will be new to regular Sitchin readers.  But it's certainly good to see a new, posthumous release of his writings lovingly curated by his niece.

Written by Andy Lloyd, 5th October 2015


1) Zecharia Sitchin & Janet Sitchin (Ed) "The Anunnaki Chronicles: A Zecharia Sitchin Reader" 28th Spetember 2015, Bear and Co.,  with thanks to Lee









The Nature of Enkidu

The ancient Mesopotamian Epic of Gilgamesh is one of the world's oldest written tales, telling the story of the eponymous King of Uruk's doomed quest for immortality.  The cultured, urbane king takes on a travelling companion by the name of Enkidu, formerly a 'wild-man' who is tamed and cultivated by Gilgamesh.  During their adventures together, they encounter the monstrous Humbaba in the Cedar Forests (likely in current-day Lebanon) who acts as an ogre-like guardian on behalf of the god Enlil.  Excitingly for Gilgamesh fans, a previously missing passage from the epic has been found, imprinted upon a Babylonian tablet, written in cuneiform script, and authenticated by experts studying it at the Sulaymaniyah Museum in Iraq (1).  It has now been translated by Assyriologists from the original cuneiform (2).

The excerpt from the Epic inscribed upon the tiny tablet fills out the Cedar Forest encounter, and in particular subtly alters what we know about Humbaba, who appears to have had some history with the wild-man Enkidu before Gilgamesh came along:

"The most interesting piece of information provided by this new source is the continuation of the description of the Cedar Forest:

Gilgamesh and Enkidu saw ‘monkeys’ as part of the exotic and noisy fauna of the Cedar Forest; this was not mentioned in other versions of the Epic.

Humbaba emerges, not as a barbarian ogre, and but as a foreign ruler entertained with exotic music at court in the manner of Babylonian kings. The chatter of monkeys, chorus of cicada, and squawking of many kinds of birds formed a symphony (or cacophony) that daily entertained the forest’s guardian, Humbaba.

The aftermath of Gilgamesh and Enkidu’s slaying of Humbaba is now better preserved.

The passages are consistent with other versions and confirm what was already known. For example, Enkidu had spent some time with Humbaba in his youth." (3)

Almost 100 years ago, it was suggested that the Epic of Gilgamesh was the re-working of an earlier epic centred around Enkidu - that the latter version effectively inserted the King of Uruk into the story to glorify him (4).  Which begs the question, what was so great about the wild-man Enkidu and, by extension, the equally tough forester Humbaba?  There's been plenty of speculation in the past that the wild-man was some kind of hominid.  Suggestions include a Bigfoot, a Neanderthal, a Denisovan and, in Humbaba's case, possibly even a Gigantopithecus (5).  It's interesting that Enkidu is effectively tamed and civilised by a temple prostitute sent by Gilgamesh to seduce the feral troublemaker.  Perhaps this very ancient tale describes the end of the Neanderthals as a separate human species long before:

"Interbreeding with ancient humans has civilized the Neanderthals, but also weakened and deracinated them, estranging them from nature.  Indeed, [in The Epic of Gilgamesh] the process is cast as a seduction and wisdom a degenerative corruption perpetrated by a whore (the whore of civilization, who will later reappear as the Biblical whore of Babylon, and their "six days and seven nights" of fornication will echo in the creation story of Genesis. Likewise, Adam's eating of the forbidden fruit of knowledge proffered by Eve also finds a thematic foreshadowing." (5)

How can we interpret this in a Sitchinite context?  Might Enkidu represent the early Earth hominids which were genetically manipulated by the Anunnaki colonists, and enslaved?  Some of the threads in Sitchin's writings reflect these change in Enkidu's nature.  Indeed, he notes that the name 'Enkidu' means "by Enki created" (6), not unlike humanity presumably.  To Sitchin, the location of the guarded Cedar Forest in Lebanon was of central importance, as this was the landing place of the gods.  But might the whole narrative about Enkidu also be metaphorical for the transition from hominid to human?  It seems to be in keeping with other Mesopotamian myths about the origins of humanity which, if read literally, imply outside intervention.  In which case, I find it interesting that these new segments of the epic, which have emerged very recently, include a backdrop of musically-talented monkeys in the forest - one of which Gilgamesh and Enkidu 'meet' (3) - and a closer intertwining of Enkidu and Humbaba.  Taken together, an entire faction of uncivilised, lower hominids emerges from the tale which Gilgamesh must refine and/or overcome to achieve his vainglorious goal of immortality.

By the way, did you know that the controversial scholar Robert Temple, author of 'The Sirius Mystery', has also produced a translation of the Epic of Gilgamesh which was performed in the Royal National Theatre in London in 1993 (7)?

Written by Andy Lloyd, 5th October 2015


1)   Chauvet "New Clay Tablet Adds 20 Lines to Epic of Gilgamesh" 29th September 2015

2)  Farouk Al-Rawi & Andrew George, 'Back to the Cedar Forest: The beginning and end of Tablet V of the Standard Babylonian Epic of Gilgameš.' Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 2014, 66 . pp. 69-90 The 20 new lines are inserted into the rest of what is already known from Tablet V in this downloadable paper:

3)  Osama S. M. Amin "The Newly Discovered Tablet V of the Epic of Gilgamesh" 24th September 2015 with thanks to Lee

4)  Morris Jastrow (Ed) "An old Babylonian version of the Gilgamesh Epic", Ch. VI. pp 33-40, 1920, cited in

5)  Andrew Zega & Bernd Dams  "Gilgamesh, a new interpretation" 27th October 2011

6)  Zecharia Sitchin "There Were Giants Upon the Earth" Ch. XII, Bear and Co., 2010

7)  "Robert Temple Translation of the Epic of Gilgamesh"


Photo Credit: Osama S.M. Amin


Life on Tidally-Locked Worlds

Two recent scientific findings, published in academic journals, have raised the prospect of finding habitable tidally-locked planets orbiting close to cool dwarf stars.  This is a significant boost to the Dark Star Theory, because it seems highly likely that for a planet in a sub-brown dwarf system to be habitable, it would have to be so close to the parent 'star' that it would be tidally locked (1).  By this, we mean that the orbiting planet is forced to attain a rotational period that is synchronous with its orbital period.  If you want to see that in action, simply look up into our sky most nights.  The Moon is tidally locked, due to its close proximity to Earth, which is why we only ever see one side of the Moon facing us. 

The problem with a tidally-locked world orbiting a star is that the side facing the star would be severely heated compared to the 'dark side' which would never see any light, and would be completely frozen.  Even if the planet was able to generate an atmosphere, it is very likely that the planet would experience two very extreme climates, making life very difficult everywhere except for the thin no-man's land joining the two extreme hemispheres.  That's not the only problem, either - until recently, it seemed likely that these star-hugging worlds would be devoid of protective magnetic fields.  But that problem appears to be receding (2).  Indeed, the close proximity of the planet to a dwarf star provides the additional benefit of heating the world through tidal heating:

"But in new research by University of Washington scientists published in the journal Astrobiology, a planet in a compact orbit around a red dwarf star could receive a gravitational boost that could act as a planetary immune system of sorts, potentially shielding the worst radiation from sterilizing nearby worlds. This mechanism would put red dwarfs back in the life-hunting arena.  It was generally thought that tidally-locked planets were devoid of planetary magnetic fields, like the magnetosphere that surround Earth. But this may not be the case. 

"While orbiting a red dwarf star, a potentially habitable planet will likely become locked, resigning one hemisphere to an eternity of perpetual light. The close proximity to the star will also result in tidal heating in the planet’s mantle — during its orbit, the star’s gravitational field will periodically squash the world, driving a dynamo of heating. Much like Jupiter’s hellish moon Io, where tidal heating from Jupiter’s tides drive the most violent examples of volcanoes in the solar system, these worlds would experience tidal heating, just on a less extreme scale.  "This tidal heating may not sound particularly life-friendly either, but it turns out that planets that undergo this form of heating are very good at dissipating heat from their cores. As the cores of these planets cool, the conditions may be ripe for the creation of global magnetic fields." (3)

This is, of course, the picture I have painted for a possible binary Dark Star in our outer solar system (4) where an Earth-like world might be warmed by its proximity to a rather old sub-brown dwarf.  Later, in one of my novels, I described how such a viable home-world might appear (5).  I assumed, at that time, that there would be a warm, viable light side, but also an extremely cold, inhospitable dark side to this home-world, providing us with an overall appearance for this world which I likened to the 'eye of Horus'.  However, new research, published last month, suggests that certain jet-stream weather patterns on roughly Earth-sized, tidally-locked worlds in compact orbits around dwarf stars might provide a more moderate climate than first thought (6).

"For tidally locked exoplanets to be potentially habitable, they must have a functional planetary "air conditioning system" that balances surface temperatures across the light and dark sides. In one climate type uncovered by the [computer] simulations, this air conditioning system is overridden by an eastward wind jet (fast flowing air currents) that messes with circulation in the upper layers of the atmosphere along the equator and prevents heat transfer to the night side.

That only occurs on exoplanets with rotation periods under 12 days, however. The simulations showed that the rest have either two westward jets at high latitudes or a longitudinal "smearing" of the upper atmosphere hotspot across the substellar point (the point at which the star is in zenith, or directly overhead). Both of these other climate types leave the air conditioning system unaffected and thus make the surface potentially habitable." (7)

This analysis also provides us with a maximum rotational period for such a viable home-world - of just 12 days!  If this was a planet orbiting around the Sun, then this proximity would mean that the world would be utterly frazzled.  But orbiting around a sub-brown dwarf, such a short rotational period is highly reasonable.  The Galilean moon Europa, which orbits Jupiter in about 3.5 Earth days, has a global sub-surface ocean, warmed by tidal heating.  So, an Earth-like world at a similar distance around a sub-brown dwarf in the outer solar system would be even warmer, potentially have its own protective magnetic field, and possibly a viable atmosphere whose 'air-conditioning system' might make surface conditions moderate on a global scale. 

Written by Andy Lloyd, 11th October 2015


1)  J. Kasting et al "Habitable zones around main sequence stars" Icarus. 1993 Jan;101(1):108-28,

2)  Peter Kelley "Earth-like planets around small stars likely have protective magnetic fields, aiding chance for life" 29th September 2015 with thanks to Lee

3)  Ian O'Neill "Angry Little Stars Could Produce Life-Friendly Exoplanets" 2nd October 2015 with thanks to Lee

4)  A. Lloyd "Dark Star: The Planet X Evidence" Timeless Voyager Press 2005

5)  A. Lloyd "The Followers of Horus" Timeless Voyager Press 2010

6)  L. Carone et al "Connecting the dots – II. Phase changes in the climate dynamics of tidally locked terrestrial exoplanets" MNRAS (November 01, 2015) 453 (3): 2412-2437

7)  Richard Moss "Tidally locked exoplanets more habitable than previously thought" 15th September 2015 with thanks to Mark 



Chinese Teeth and the Neanderthals

It appears that the Neanderthals managed to keep Homo Sapiens out of Europe for 40,000 years before we eventually broke through, fatally eroding their species.  How do we know this?  A new discovery of 47 human teeth at the Fuyan cave in Daoxian, southern China, dating back between 80,000 and 120,000 years, show that a massive 'out-of Africa' migration was successful in an easterly direction across Asia (1,2).  Yet, a northward progression through the Levant into Europe was blocked until ~40,000 years ago. 

"University College London paleoanthropologist María Martinón-Torres said our species made it to southern China tens of thousands of years before colonizing Europe perhaps because of the entrenched presence of our hardy cousins, the Neanderthals, in Europe and the harsh, cold European climate.  "This finding suggests that Homo sapiens is present in Asia much earlier than the classic, recent 'Out of Africa' hypothesis was suggesting: 50,000 years ago," Martinón-Torres said.

"[Paleoanthropologist Wu] Liu [of the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology] said the teeth are about twice as old as the earliest evidence for modern humans in Europe. "We hope our Daoxian human fossil discovery will make people understand that East Asia is one of the key areas for the study of the origin and evolution of modern humans," Liu said.

"Martinón-Torres said some migrations out of Africa have been labelled "failed dispersals."  Fossils from Israeli caves indicate modern humans about 90,000 years ago reached "the gates of Europe," Martinón-Torres said, but "never managed to enter.  It may have been hard to take over land Neanderthals had occupied for hundreds of thousands of years.  In addition, it is logical to think that dispersals toward the east were likely environmentally easier than moving toward the north, given the cold winters of Europe" Martinón-Torres said." (3)

How this fits into Zecharia Sitchin's theory is open for debate.  He did write about the sudden blossoming of civilisation in China which occurred around 4000 years ago, and some of the similarities between ancient Chinese script and cuneiform, as well as comparative Asiatic mythologies (4), but not the prehistoric migrations of early humans.  There are also Chinese pyramids which appear to date back 5000 years, perhaps older (5).  Were the Anunnaki making their presence felt in prehistoric China, I wonder, seeking natural resources?  The presence of gold throughout China is amply exploited by modern mining companies, and China is now the world's largest gold producer - although gold reserves in the country amount to only about 7% of the global total (6).

Either way, such an extensive migration across the Asian landmass begs the question as to why early humans failed to make similar progress into Europe.  Although the bitterly cold glacial winters of the Ice Age era doubtlessly played a part, it is considered likely that the Neanderthals effectively shut out any attempted migrations of Homo Sapiens (2).  I have a soft spot for the Neanderthals, mainly because some folk close to me used to compare my appearance to them, back in the days when I had hair!  They were bigger, stronger and likely just as intelligent as us (for what that's worth).  A real mystery about why they lost out to us, while the last glacial period was still in full swing.  We humans have about 2% of the Neanderthal genes in us still, (with at least 20%, and perhaps as much as 70% of the Neanderthal genome spread out through the human population (7)).  These Neanderthal genes are mostly to do with skin and hair, likely aiding human resilience to cold climates.  So, interbreeding clearly played a part in the story of the human replacement of Neanderthals on the European continent, with us perhaps 'stealing' the adaptive genes necessary to deal with the cold European Ice Age climate.  The complex picture of species divergence and then interbreeding begins to spiral further when you also include the Denisovans (8).

Alternatively, perhaps all of this simply reflects the status of these archaic human species as our genetic cousins through the lens of the genetic manipulations performed by the Anunnaki?  Divergence between Neanderthals and the human lineage occurred over half a million years ago, perhaps reflecting a mixed bag of the results of their work to create useful hominids.  In my phase of novel writing the Neanderthals make an appearance on the Anunnaki home-world, which I imagined they would be ideally suited to (9).  I imagined that they were removed from here to serve the 'gods' at home, leaving behind us weaker brethren.  But that remains just my idle speculation.


Written by Andy Lloyd, 22nd October 2015


1)  Robin McKie "Neanderthals 'Kept Our Early Ancestors at Europe's Edge'" The Observer 18th October 2015, p22

2)  Wu Liu et al "The earliest unequivocally modern humans in southern China" Nature, 14th October 2015, doi:10.1038/nature15696

3)  Will Dunham "Teeth from Chinese cave recast history of early human migration" 15th October 2015

4)  Zecharia Sitchin "When Time Began" Avon 1993 pp371-3

5)  Philip Coppens "China’s Great Pyramids Controversy" 1995

6)  "Gold Mining in China"

7)  Charles Choi "At least 20% of Neanderthal DNA Is in Humans" 29th January 2014

8)  Karl Gruber "Discovery of Oldest DNA Scrambles Human Origins Picture" 5th December 2013

9)  Andy Lloyd "The Followers of Horus" Timeless Voyager Press 2010











Unravelling the Mystery of the Lunar Craters

As was discussed in the above article, it is generally accepted that an apocalyptic bombardment ripped the inner solar system apart about 3.9 billion years ago.  This 'late, heavy bombardment' took place well after the solar system had stabilised into an orderly state, and occurred over perhaps hundreds of million years in duration (1).  It's effects were sensational - the chunks of rock that hammered the inner solar system were of immense size.  Even the smaller impactors could have led to the extinction of all life on Earth, let alone the big beasts that pummelled us, and the Moon.  It is the Moon's surface itself that provides the most startling visual record of the bombardment, as well as the rock samples which have enabled planetary scientists to date the events to this period (2).  By contrast, tectonic movements and geological activity during the intervening 4 billion years or so have disrupted the cratering which was also doubtlessly visited upon the Earth at the same time.

The cratering patterns on the Moon have also changed over time, with much more information useful to scientists now buried beneath the surface.  The bombardment cracked the lunar surface and made the lunar crust much more porous.   New studies are starting to reveal these hidden secrets buried within the deeper layers of the lunar crust, courtesy of NASA's GRAIL mission (3).  This mission used twin spacecraft to map gravitational anomalies within the Moon, picking up concentrations of mass below the planetary surface which scientists call 'mascons'.  A pattern has emerged regarding the nature of these lunar mascons, suggestive of filled-in craters below the lunar surface:

""GRAIL data confirm that lunar mascons were generated when large asteroids or comets impacted the ancient moon, when its interior was much hotter than it is now," said Jay Melosh, a GRAIL co-investigator at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind.. "We believe the data from GRAIL show how the moon's light crust and dense mantle combined with the shock of a large impact to create the distinctive pattern of density anomalies that we recognize as mascons."

"The origin of lunar mascons has been a mystery in planetary science since their discovery in 1968 by a team at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. Researchers generally agree mascons resulted from ancient impacts billions of years ago. It was not clear until now how much of the unseen excess mass resulted from lava filling the crater or iron-rich mantle upwelling to the crust.  On a map of the moon's gravity field, a mascon appears in a target pattern. The bulls-eye has a gravity surplus. It is surrounded by a ring with a gravity deficit. A ring with a gravity surplus surrounds the bulls-eye and the inner ring. This pattern arises as a natural consequence of crater excavation, collapse and cooling following an impact. The increase in density and gravitational pull at a mascon's bulls-eye is caused by lunar material melted from the heat of a long-ago asteroid impact." (4)

So, even though the lunar surface that we can see appears pretty bashed about, even more impact craters lie hidden below the surface, some of them massive.  One of these impacts might even have tipped the Moon onto its side (5).   It is now hoped that further studies of these hidden craters can provide a clearer picture of the nature of the late, heavy bombardment including, perhaps, an insight into its origin (which remains something of a mystery):

"Although the upper layers of the moon's crust are too fractured to retain much of a record of the collisions from the Late Heavy Bombardment, Soderblom and his colleagues suggest that the deeper layers might provide an idea of how many large impacts the moon and other bodies in the inner solar system suffered during this ancient onslaught.  This research could even help scientists track the origins of the rocks that hurled around during the Late Heavy Bombardment. 

""What we really hope to do is to figure out the number of impacts in the range of 100 kilometers (60 miles) in diameter, and from that, we can extrapolate to the smaller craters, assuming different populations of impactors, and those different assumptions will tell us where the impactors came from," Soderblom said in a statement. "This will help [us] to understand the origin of the Late Heavy Bombardment, and whether it was disrupted material from the asteroid belt or if it was further out."" (6)

There are many hypotheses about what caused the bombardment.  Migration of the gas giants is a current favourite, an hypothesis known as the Nice model (7).  The idea goes that their collective migration caused Neptune to graze the Kuiper Belt, sending swarms of asteroids and comets into the inner solar system. 

I don't think this degree of complexity is required.  I suspect that an outside entity was to blame, crashing through the stabilised solar system accompanied by world-shattering debris (8).  My bet is that this object would have been a sub-brown dwarf companion of the Sun, perturbed from its wide, elliptical orbit into the path of the planets.

Perhaps these on-going investigations into the hidden cratering of the Moon will reveal new insights into the source of the bombardment, and solve this mystery once and for all.


Written by Andy Lloyd, 28th October 2015


1)   Andy Lloyd "Early Earth Pummelled for over 1 Billion Years" 19th August 2014

2)  "Late Heavy Bombardment"

3)  NASA "GRAIL: Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory"

4)  "NASA's GRAIL Mission Solves Mystery of Moon's Surface Gravity" 30th May 2013

5)  Andy Lloyd "Moon Was Knocked onto its Side" 18th May 2014

6)  Charles Choi "Moon's Shattered Crust Could Shed Light on Earth Life's Origins" 19th October 2015 with thanks to Lee

7)  "The Late Heavy Bombardment ends"

8)  Andy Lloyd "Dark Star: The Planet X Evidence" Timeless Voyager Press, 2005






The Martian

Plenty of great science in this film, which was very NASA focussed in both the storyline and sentiment.  It got a bit crazy towards the end, as the risks taken to save the stranded astronaut got wilder.  Also, some of the 'mutinous' actions of the crew, and the subterfuge used to give them an alternative mission, could have been straight out of my novel 'The Followers of Horus' (along with the rotating gym with exercise bikes!!).

The oddest part of the movie for me were the two rockets sat upright on the Martian surface.  The first, which was parked alongside the colony, was carefully monitored, and prepared for immediate readiness in case a dust storm flared up.  In the event that one did, the tilt of the rocket became literally the tipping point towards potential disaster.  The precarious nature of the operation was well understood by the astronauts, to the extent that they had to make a tough choice, or all end up stranded.

Compare and contrast to the second rocket, left some way off for what I guess was intended to be a future mission.  Firstly, how had that rocket actually got there, without a crew, standing perfectly upright like Thunderbird 1?  Secondly, if the global dust storms were such a known risk, then how come this rocket was knowingly left like that, exposed to the risk of getting knocked over - presumably for years?  Uh huh.  But, still an awesome movie, I have to say.


Written by Andy Lloyd, 22nd October 2015




Dark Star Blogs

 2013:  01   02   03   04   05   06   07   08   09  

    2014:  10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21

2015:  22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33

2016:  34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45

2017:  46   47   48

You can keep informed of updates by following me on Twitter:


Or like my Facebook Page: